July 13, 2002
v The determinisms of the physical characteristics embedded in our calls have been unravelled. It is a landmark in biological science.
v There is a subtle truth behind it which determines all one's behaviour precisely. Maybe we call it by a similar name, the Psychological DNA.
v It may not be difficult to arrive at an exhaustive list of characteristics of man. Many of them will be
Caution – alertness
Strength – endurance – energy – will.
Character – behaviour – manners – Personality
v It will be right to go for an exhaustive list, to grade them as per 1 to 9 and select for all levels only terms of equal intensity and thus give it a classified form.
v Science does not initially question 'of what use is it?' because the knowledge itself is rewarding. Finally, if such a system has any use, it is better to spell it out.
v The Token Act I am mentioning demands the play of all one's characteristics, though in varying measures and reveals to oneself the measure of its right use, as without it, the result will not issue.
v In doing an act and bringing it to fruition, one lays himself bare and identifies himself with the subtle personality of the act.
v As an act is a miniature of the universe, ALL traits find play. The right intensity of each trait contributes to the result. A little excess spoils, a little shortage does not trigger the action.
v As we assume the act has yielded result, it goes without saying that every one of the traits has found the right measure of play.
v An acute intelligent observation is called for to detect the measure of play of each trait.
v Successful results can issue for infinitely various combinations of these traits in infinitely varying persons.
v "I always bring out the result and I am always cautious" says one. His measure of caution will vary from another's.
v Here are two possibilities for the individual.
1. To see his characteristics in play.
2. To note their measure of combination with the act.
v Even the first observation will raise his efficiency.
v The measured study of the second will give him an enormous functional power over himself.
v At a further stage, at least theoretically, it can give him the power to change the structure of his 'DNA'.
v In this first article it will be too far fetched to discuss methods by which it can be generalised so that it may emerge as a scientific tool for anyone.
v We can spell out the principle at least. The scale needed to measure the traits or their intensity will be a subtle psychological scale. To evolve that will be the pre-condition for such a study.
v It is one thing a person measures himself on such a scale and it is another thing it becomes an impersonal scale.
v Apart from the scope of an act, which I have been speaking of, it has this possibility too.